Ayoob Misrepresents "Why We Carry Guns"

Ayoob at Backwoods Home writes about an elderly couple who were brutally murdered in their home.


Just like this couple-- Jose Guerena was in his home when he was attacked and brutally murdered by violent killers.

Jose_Guerena_shooting

The training, and organization, and decision to target and then to kill Jose Guerena was deliberate at each step in the process. The trigger pullers committed murder, as did those who sent them (prosecutor, judge, sheriff). Those who continue to enable them share the blame (prosecutors, judges, state and federal jurisdictions). And that includes those who excuse this and/or support their training, tactics, and deeds, like Mr Ayoob here. "Enforcers uber alles"?

When laws no longer apply, then there is no law, except what corruptocrats want to make up, an 'insiders mafia'. None of the 'perps' in this gang are charged with crimes since there is no law, only 'connections' and 'raw force' in this crime wave of organized theft and violence.

Daily links to injustice can be found here.

The point is not that these thing happen- THE POINT IS THAT THE VIOLENCE IS PREMEDITATED, TRAINED, AND ENABLED. When responsible people draw attention to it and try to point out that such violence and cover-up undermines law and order; then rather then focusing on the data and the problem - -
- some choose to resort to name calling and ad hominem attacks, like Mr Ayoob here and here.
They do this because the data is overwhelming and damning, so they avoid reason while defending the horrific. Notice people bringing data to the discussion, while Mas and Buddies resort to 'name calling' and 'changing the argument' games. Avoiding the substance of arguments reveals the weakness of their position. By refusing to take action to put an end to 'enforcers gone wild', they enable more of the same.

If there was a single 'oathkeeper' that had jurisdiction in such 'enforcer' violence, A SINGLE ONE, then laws would apply, and the concept of law would be preserved. But tribal loyalty is more important than the law, or the unalienable rights of their victims. By continued enabling of such premeditated organized crimes, these perps and their enablers destroy what used to be our system of government. They make themselves repugnant to the concept of law. They make themselves the 'domestic enemies' Matt Bracken writes about.

Q: "Why we carry guns"?
A: Because Tories behaved just like this, abusing the people, and we made them leave.

“When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it.”
- Frederic Bastiat

“A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.”
- George Washington

 “When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law.”
- Frederic Bastiat

“Whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience.”
- John Locke

Absolved.
It's what we explained to the Tories and their mercenary army of enforcers.
That's "why we carry guns".