Local jurisdictions and state jurisdictions may not ignore the Constitution.
Can a business, a city, or a state decide on a little slavery, for the common good? NO. The 13th Amendment is the law of the land. And those Amendments are part of the Constitution from which those jurisdictions draw authority.
The Constitution acknowledges unalienable rights, granted by your creator- It does not 'grant you rights'. You have unalienable rights as a result of being human. We Constituted this government to protect those rights. Any law repugnant to the Constitution is Null and Void. Any government that makes itself repugnant to the Constitution, violates it's foundation, thereby rendering itself Null and Void.
Can a business, a city, or a state decide to infringe on the right to keep and bear arms? No more than they can choose slavery. No Constitutional entity can retain authority by violating the Constitution.
So any city/state "infringing"- Removes the foundation of it's authority, and makes itself a 'domestic enemy to the Constitution'. Such entities are 'without the rule of law' by their own doing. Mercenaries in their employ are without legal foundation traceable to the Constitution. Anyone sworn to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic" is duty bound by their oath to defend the American people against these 'domestic enemies'. Failure to stop domestic enemies, or 'just following orders' was not a valid excuse for the train conductors and prison guards at Auschwitz. Nor is inaction valid today in the face of domestic enemies.
Which is where 2012 finds us. On a declared battlefield (NDAA, section 1301, 1302) without unalienable rights enumerated in the BOR. The NDAA terminated our republic, and declares that the country is "without rule of law".
How can any city/state/federal agency declare war on unalienable rights, war on America?
Because they are.
Because no one is stopping them.
Because 'There is no law', only petty corrupt men.
Only tyrants violating the Constitution, and their hired mercenaries.
Each individual chooses, either to bow down and lick their boots and just follow orders, or chooses to stand and demand his own unalienable rights.
The choices are:
a) Prison Guard at Auschwitz just doing his job following orders, or
b) Defend the Constitution against Domestic Enemies, or
c) Keep out of sight and hope the enforcers do not brutalize you too bad (other than robbing you and your children).
2012 is time to start to Arrest and Try for Treason those who are 'infringing' or otherwise making themselves repugnant to the Constitution.
And let's not forget the 'enforcers'. Swearing to support and defend the Constitution, then bearing arms against those same principles is as heinous a form of treason as can be imagined.
Treason has always been dealt with extremely harshly, especially by those who have been betrayed.
2012 is a time for choosing:
The Constitution and Law?
or,
Rule of corrupt men continuing to do as they please, waging war against America?
Update: Mas Ayoob at Backwoods Home comments that I need to "learn that things don’t work the way you think they should. It’ll be much better for you to find that out in school than in the less-forgiving real world."
His "real world" accepts that enforcers/prosecutors/judges/legislators enable corruption and tyranny as they make themselves repugnant to the Constitution.
WROL enabled by the very people we entrust to prevent such things... sad.
.
10 comments:
Well said and posted.
I missed this until now. Great post. I'll pass it on.
Damn Straight!
China
III
Very Good. Thanks for this well written piece.
As we say in Australia: Too bloody right!
Sofa I read the original piece and then followed your link to the postings on Backwoods Home.
After analyzing what you wrote and applying logic to what you said reveals your statements to be true.
Quoting Ayoob, "It appears that Sofa still hasn’t taken a Civics class, nor had that strongly recommended talk with a school guidance counselor." and "Sofa, if your middle school ever makes Civics 101 mandatory, you’ll learn that things don’t work the way you think they should. It’ll be much better for you to find that out in school than in the less-forgiving real world."
I would take that as a insult to my intelligence. You and I have never met however your reasoning ability, not to mention your ability to express your thoughts in writing clearly indicate a man of experience in the real world and not a 'middle-schooler'.
'MD Matt' stands firmly upon a foundation of sand.
Both defer whether they have God-given rights to be determined by others, to determine whether those rights exist and if they do when, where and in what manner they may be allowed to exercise them. This after being hauled into a court and bankrupted by the costs of a defense. The final determination to be made by those who are swayed by the machinations of political and/or financial considerations.
Let's try this. You and I will share a two-man fighting hole defending our rights and we'll let 'Mas and 'MD Matt' lick their masters boots. What do say to that arrangement? Maybe we could invite a few others to occupy the holes to our right, left and rear?
Don't take them to heart Sofa. Bedbugs can be shaken out and the linen washed clean.
In solidarity;
SEMPER FIDELIS
RS
R- Mas reveals his inner self. It is anthropology to wander in his posts/comments and come to understand the enforcer mentality. Get to know these people. Learn their phrases and excuses. Mao suggests we learn from them.
Discuss with them if you would try to save them, or if you want to understand their ilk.
And when they cannot reason, they demean and become angry. They are used to having their way, and they lash out when lesser beings do not submit.
Superb.
That was absolutely brilliant, my friend. Sorry it took so long to comment, but that was superb. I'm going with the So Always to Tyrants translation though.
Post a Comment